Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s dis­ease?

Why are we doing so lit­tle to pre­vent it?

Donepezil is plainly not the answer, but advances are indi­cat­ing real pro­tec­tion (Prof David Smith Oxford)
He proved that in cases with high homo­cys­teine levels,B12, folate and B6 showed clear protection.

I hope you can read the following!

Alzheimer’s dis­ease is a phys­i­cal dis­ease which attacks the brain result­ing in impaired mem­ory, think­ing and behav­iour. The dis­ease is named for the Ger­man physi­cian, Alois Alzheimer who, in 1907, first described it.

As brain cells die, the sub­stance of the brain shrinks. Abnor­mal mate­r­ial builds up as “tan­gles” in the cen­tre of the brain cells and “plaques” out­side the brain cells, dis­rupt­ing mes­sages within the brain, dam­ag­ing con­nec­tions between brain cells. This leads to the even­tual death of the brain cells and pre­vents the recall of information.

Mem­ory of recent events is the first to be affected, but as the dis­ease pro­gresses, long-term mem­ory is also lost. The dis­ease also affects many of the brain’s other func­tions and con­se­quently, many other aspects of behav­iour are disturbed.

There are two dif­fer­ent types of Alzheimer’s dis­ease:
Spo­radic Alzheimer’s dis­ease
# The dis­ease can affect adults at any age, but usu­ally occurs after age 65
# Spo­radic Alzheimer’s dis­ease is by far the most com­mon form of Alzheimer’s dis­ease
# It affects peo­ple who may or may not have a fam­ily his­tory of the dis­ease. Sev­eral com­pet­ing hypothe­ses exist try­ing to explain the cause of the dis­ease.
The old­est, on which most cur­rently avail­able drug ther­a­pies are based, is the cholin­er­gic hypoth­e­sis, which pro­poses that AD is caused by reduced syn­the­sis of the neu­ro­trans­mit­ter acetyl­choline. The cholin­er­gic hypoth­e­sis has not main­tained wide­spread sup­port, largely because med­ica­tions intended to treat acetyl­choline defi­ciency have not been very effec­tive.
Other cholin­er­gic effects have also been pro­posed, for exam­ple, ini­ti­a­tion of large-scale aggre­ga­tion of amy­loid, lead­ing to gen­er­alised neuroinflammation.

In 1991, the amy­loid hypoth­e­sis pos­tu­lated that amy­loid beta (A?) deposits are the fun­da­men­tal cause of the disease.

Sup­port for this pos­tu­late comes from the loca­tion of the gene for the amy­loid beta pre­cur­sor pro­tein (APP) on chro­mo­some 21, together with the fact that peo­ple with tri­somy 21 (Down Syn­drome) who have an extra gene copy almost uni­ver­sally exhibit AD by 40 years of age.
Also APOE4, the major genetic risk fac­tor for AD, leads to excess amy­loid buildup in the brain before AD symp­toms arise. Thus, A? depo­si­tion pre­cedes clin­i­cal AD.
Fur­ther evi­dence comes from the find­ing that trans­genic mice that express a mutant form of the human APP gene develop fib­ril­lar amy­loid plaques and Alzheimer’s-like brain pathol­ogy with spa­tial learn­ing deficits.

An exper­i­men­tal vac­cine was found to clear the amy­loid plaques in early human tri­als, but it did not have any sig­nif­i­cant effect on demen­tia. Researchers have been led to sus­pect non-plaque A? oligomers (aggre­gates of many monomers) as the pri­mary path­o­genic form of A?. These toxic oligomers, also referred to as amyloid-derived dif­fusible lig­ands (ADDLs), bind to a sur­face recep­tor on neu­rons and change the struc­ture of the synapse, thereby dis­rupt­ing neu­ronal communication.

One recep­tor for A? oligomers may be the prion pro­tein, the same pro­tein that has been linked to mad cow dis­ease and the related human con­di­tion, Creutzfeldt-Jakob dis­ease, thus poten­tially link­ing the under­ly­ing mech­a­nism of these neu­rode­gen­er­a­tive dis­or­ders with that of Alzheimer’s disease.

In 2009, this the­ory was updated, sug­gest­ing that a close rel­a­tive of the beta-amyloid pro­tein, and not nec­es­sar­ily the beta-amyloid itself, may be a major cul­prit in the dis­ease. The the­ory holds that an amyloid-related mech­a­nism that prunes neu­ronal con­nec­tions in the brain in the fast-growth phase of early life may be trig­gered by aging-related processes in later life to cause the neu­ronal with­er­ing of Alzheimer’s disease.

N-APP, a frag­ment of APP from the peptide’s N-terminus, is adja­cent to beta-amyloid and is cleaved from APP by one of the same enzymes. N-APP trig­gers the self-destruct path­way by bind­ing to a neu­ronal recep­tor called death recep­tor 6 (DR6, also known as TNFRSF21).
DR6 is highly expressed in the human brain regions most affected by Alzheimer’s, so it is pos­si­ble that the N-APP/DR6 path­way might be hijacked in the aging brain to cause dam­age. In this model, beta-amyloid plays a com­ple­men­tary role, by depress­ing synap­tic function.

A 2004 study found that depo­si­tion of amy­loid plaques does not cor­re­late well with neu­ron loss.
This obser­va­tion sup­ports the tau hypoth­e­sis, the idea that tau pro­tein abnor­mal­i­ties ini­ti­ate the dis­ease cas­cade.
In this model, hyper­phos­pho­ry­lated tau begins to pair with other threads of tau. Even­tu­ally, they form neu­rofib­ril­lary tan­gles inside nerve cell bod­ies.
When this occurs, the micro­tubules dis­in­te­grate, col­laps­ing the neuron’s trans­port sys­tem. This may result first in mal­func­tions in bio­chem­i­cal com­mu­ni­ca­tion between neu­rons and later in the death of the cells. Her­pes sim­plex virus type 1 has also been pro­posed to play a causative role in peo­ple car­ry­ing the sus­cep­ti­ble ver­sions of the apoE gene.

Another hypoth­e­sis asserts that the dis­ease may be caused by age-related myelin break­down in the brain. Demyeli­na­tion leads to axonal trans­port dis­rup­tions, lead­ing to loss of neu­rons that become stale. Iron released dur­ing myelin break­down is hypoth­e­sized to cause fur­ther dam­age. Home­o­sta­tic myelin repair processes con­tribute to the devel­op­ment of pro­teina­ceous deposits such as amyloid-beta and tau.

Oxida­tive stress is a sig­nif­i­cant cause in the for­ma­tion of the pathology.

AD indi­vid­u­als show 70% loss of locus coeruleus cells that pro­vide nor­ep­i­neph­rine (in addi­tion to its neu­ro­trans­mit­ter role) that locally dif­fuses from “vari­cosi­ties” as an endoge­nous anti­in­flam­ma­tory agent in the microen­vi­ron­ment around the neu­rons, glial cells, and blood ves­sels in the neo­cor­tex and hip­pocam­pus.]
It has been shown that nor­ep­i­neph­rine stim­u­lates mouse microglia to sup­press A?-induced pro­duc­tion of cytokines and their phago­cy­to­sis of A?.[54] This sug­gests that degen­er­a­tion of the locus ceruleus might be respon­si­ble for increased A? depo­si­tion in AD brains.
Patho­phys­i­ol­ogy
Main arti­cle: Bio­chem­istry of Alzheimer’s dis­ease
Histopatho­logic image of senile plaques seen in the cere­bral cor­tex of a per­son with Alzheimer’s dis­ease of pre­se­nile onset. Sil­ver impreg­na­tion.
Neuropathology

Alzheimer’s dis­ease is char­ac­terised by loss of neu­rons and synapses in the cere­bral cor­tex and cer­tain sub­cor­ti­cal regions. This loss results in gross atro­phy of the affected regions, includ­ing degen­er­a­tion in the tem­po­ral lobe and pari­etal lobe, and parts of the frontal cor­tex and cin­gu­late gyrus. Stud­ies using MRI and PET have doc­u­mented reduc­tions in the size of spe­cific brain regions in patients as they pro­gressed from mild cog­ni­tive impair­ment to Alzheimer’s dis­ease, and in com­par­i­son with sim­i­lar images from healthy older adults.

Both amy­loid plaques and neu­rofib­ril­lary tan­gles are clearly vis­i­ble by microscopy in brains of those afflicted by AD. Plaques are dense, mostly insol­u­ble deposits of amyloid-beta pep­tide and cel­lu­lar mate­r­ial out­side and around neu­rons. Tan­gles (neu­rofib­ril­lary tan­gles) are aggre­gates of the microtubule-associated pro­tein tau which has become hyper­phos­pho­ry­lated and accu­mu­late inside the cells them­selves. Although many older indi­vid­u­als develop some plaques and tan­gles as a con­se­quence of aging, the brains of AD patients have a greater num­ber of them in spe­cific brain regions such as the tem­po­ral lobe.[56] Lewy bod­ies are not rare in AD patient’s brains.
Bio­chem­istry
Enzymes act on the APP (amy­loid pre­cur­sor pro­tein) and cut it into frag­ments. The beta-amyloid frag­ment is cru­cial in the for­ma­tion of senile plaques in AD.

Alzheimer’s dis­ease has been iden­ti­fied as a pro­tein mis­fold­ing dis­ease (pro­teopa­thy), caused by accu­mu­la­tion of abnor­mally folded A-beta and tau pro­teins in the brain. Plaques are made up of small pep­tides, 39–43 amino acids in length, called beta-amyloid (also writ­ten as A-beta or A?).

Beta-amyloid is a frag­ment from a larger pro­tein called amy­loid pre­cur­sor pro­tein (APP), a trans­mem­brane pro­tein that pen­e­trates through the neuron’s mem­brane. APP is crit­i­cal to neu­ron growth, sur­vival and post-injury repair. In Alzheimer’s dis­ease, an unknown process causes APP to be divided into smaller frag­ments by enzymes through pro­te­ol­y­sis. One of these frag­ments gives rise to fib­rils of beta-amyloid, which form clumps that deposit out­side neu­rons in dense for­ma­tions known as senile plaques.
In Alzheimer’s dis­ease, changes in tau pro­tein lead to the dis­in­te­gra­tion of micro­tubules in brain cells.

AD is also con­sid­ered a tauopa­thy due to abnor­mal aggre­ga­tion of the tau pro­tein. Every neu­ron has a cytoskele­ton, an inter­nal sup­port struc­ture partly made up of struc­tures called micro­tubules. These micro­tubules act like tracks, guid­ing nutri­ents and mol­e­cules from the body of the cell to the ends of the axon and back. A pro­tein called tau sta­bi­lizes the micro­tubules when phos­pho­ry­lated, and is there­fore called a microtubule-associated pro­tein. In AD, tau under­goes chem­i­cal changes, becom­ing hyper­phos­pho­ry­lated; it then begins to pair with other threads, cre­at­ing neu­rofib­ril­lary tan­gles and dis­in­te­grat­ing the neuron’s trans­port sys­tem.
Dis­ease mechanism

Exactly how dis­tur­bances of pro­duc­tion and aggre­ga­tion of the beta amy­loid pep­tide gives rise to the pathol­ogy of AD is not known. The amy­loid hypoth­e­sis tra­di­tion­ally points to the accu­mu­la­tion of beta amy­loid pep­tides as the cen­tral event trig­ger­ing neu­ron degen­er­a­tion. Accu­mu­la­tion of aggre­gated amy­loid fib­rils, which are believed to be the toxic form of the pro­tein respon­si­ble for dis­rupt­ing the cell’s cal­cium ion home­osta­sis, induces pro­grammed cell death (apop­to­sis). It is also known that A? selec­tively builds up in the mito­chon­dria in the cells of Alzheimer’s-affected brains, and it also inhibits cer­tain enzyme func­tions and the util­i­sa­tion of glu­cose by neurons.

Var­i­ous inflam­ma­tory processes and cytokines may also have a role in the pathol­ogy of Alzheimer’s dis­ease. Inflam­ma­tion is a gen­eral marker of tis­sue dam­age in any dis­ease, and may be either sec­ondary to tis­sue dam­age in AD or a marker of an immuno­log­i­cal response.[67]

Alter­ations in the dis­tri­b­u­tion of dif­fer­ent neu­rotrophic fac­tors and in the expres­sion of their recep­tors such as the brain derived neu­rotrophic fac­tor (BDNF) have been described in AD.
Note that BDNF increases with phys­i­cal exer­cise.
Genetics

The vast major­ity of cases of Alzheimer’s dis­ease are spo­radic, mean­ing that they are not genet­i­cally inher­ited although some genes may act as risk fac­tors. On the other hand, around 0.1% of the cases are famil­ial forms of autosomal-dominant inher­i­tance, which usu­ally have an onset before age 65.

Most of auto­so­mal dom­i­nant famil­ial AD can be attrib­uted to muta­tions in one of three genes: amy­loid pre­cur­sor pro­tein (APP) and pre­se­nilins 1 and 2.

Most muta­tions in the APP and pre­se­nilin genes increase the pro­duc­tion of a small pro­tein called A?42, which is the main com­po­nent of senile plaques.
Some of the muta­tions merely alter the ratio between A?42 and the other major forms—e.g., A?40—without increas­ing A?42 lev­els. This sug­gests that pre­se­nilin muta­tions can cause dis­ease even if they lower the total amount of A? pro­duced and may point to other roles of pre­se­nilin or a role for alter­ations in the func­tion of APP and/or its frag­ments other than A?.

Most cases of Alzheimer’s dis­ease do not exhibit autosomal-dominant inher­i­tance and are termed spo­radic AD. Nev­er­the­less genetic dif­fer­ences may act as risk factors.

The best known genetic risk fac­tor is the inher­i­tance of the ?4 allele of the apolipopro­tein E (APOE). Between 40 and 80% of patients with AD pos­sess at least one apoE4 allele. The APOE4 allele increases the risk of the dis­ease by three times in het­erozy­gotes and by 15 times in homozy­gotes. Geneti­cists agree that numer­ous other genes also act as risk fac­tors or have pro­tec­tive effects that influ­ence the devel­op­ment of late onset Alzheimer’s dis­ease. Over 400 genes have been tested for asso­ci­a­tion with late-onset spo­radic AD, most with null results.

Apolipopro­tein E, type ?4 allele (APOE ?4), is asso­ci­ated with late-onset famil­ial Alzheimer’s dis­ease (AD). There is high avid­ity and spe­cific bind­ing of amy­loid ?-pep­tide with the pro­tein ApoE. To test the hypoth­e­sis that late-onset famil­ial AD may rep­re­sent the clus­ter­ing of spo­radic AD in fam­i­lies large enough to be stud­ied, we extended the analy­ses of APOE alle­les to sev­eral series of spo­radic AD patients. APOE ?4 is sig­nif­i­cantly asso­ci­ated with a series of prob­a­ble spo­radic AD patients (0.36 ± 0.042, AD, ver­sus 0.16 ± 0.027, con­trols [allele fre­quency esti­mate ± stan­dard error], p = 0.00031). Spouse con­trols did not dif­fer from CEPH grand­par­ent con­trols from the Cen­tre d’Etude du Poly­mor­phisme Humain (CEPH) or from lit­er­a­ture con­trols. A large com­bined series of autopsy-documented spo­radic AD patients also demon­strated highly sig­nif­i­cant asso­ci­a­tion with the APOE ?4 allele (0.40 ± 0.026, p ? 0.00001). These data sup­port the involve­ment of ApoE ?4 in the patho­gen­e­sis of late-onset famil­ial and spo­radic AD. ApoE iso­forms may play an impor­tant role in the metab­o­lism of ?-pep­tide, and APOE ?4 may oper­ate as a sus­cep­ti­bil­ity gene (risk fac­tor) for the clin­i­cal expres­sion of AD.

MAJOR PROTECTIVE STRATEGIES
Reverse risk fac­tors for vas­cu­lar dis­ease.
CORRECT nutri­tional defi­cien­cies.
(1) Opti­mize min­er­als , mak­ing sure that cop­per is not high and that there is no excess of lead, mer­cury or heavy met­als.
(2) Bring B12 to at least 700 pmol/l, folic acid to at least 35 nmol/L, homo­cys­teine to 8umol/L or less.
(3) Opti­mize vit­a­min 25D3 to at least 80 nmol/L
(4) Reverse insulin resis­tance (insulin at 1 hour after meal should be less than 40mU/L, while nor­mal­iz­ing glu­cose and triglyc­erides, but not over-lowering LDL cho­les­terol.
(5) Con­sume suf­fi­cient branch chain amino acids (eggs and whey pro­tein)
(6) Omega 3 fatty acids at more than 10ml/day.

ADD PROTECTIVE PLANT SUBSTANCES
(1) Turmeric at one and a half tea­spoons twice per day (with black pep­per to enhance absorp­tion and pro­long half life)(or cur­cumin 200mg tds with about 20 mg piper­ine per dose)
(2) Resver­a­trol 200mg bd
(3) Coen­zyme Q10 150 mg daily (as mixed ubiquinone and ubiquinol)
The piper­ine above will enhance Q10 absorp­tion.
(4) R alpha lipoic acid 100mg tds
(5) Acetyl l-carnitine 500mg bd
(6) Antiox­i­dants, espe­cially berry plants,(anthocyanosides and proan­tho­cyani­dins) and dark green veg­eta­bles (lutein, zexanthin,vitamin K)
(7) Cocoa fla­vanoids
(8) Include more raw and fresh food, includ­ing plenty of vit­a­min C.
PREVENT GLYCATION AND CARBONYLATION OF PROTEINS,
Con­trol Glu­cose lev­els and use l-carnosine.
ADD PHYSICAL EXERCISE AT LEAST 20 MINUTES TWICE DAILY!
Do mind activ­i­ties to increase men­tal diversity.)(Crosswords, sudoku, quizzes etc)
Med­i­tate
Lis­ten to good music every day.
Engage in con­ver­sa­tion with inter­est­ing people

Posted in Medicine | Leave a comment

Antioxidant

Between 1910 and 1948, 13 essen­tial vit­a­mins were dis­cov­ered and are cur­rently rec­og­nized uni­ver­sally. For the next 30 years, the fam­ily of vit­a­mins was thought to be com­plete — until PQQ was dis­cov­ered in 1979.

As inves­ti­ga­tors stud­ied this newly-discovered nutri­ent, found in many foods such as tofu, green tea and spinach, it became appar­ent that PQQ was essen­tial for good health. But it wasn’t until 2003 that Japan­ese sci­en­tists dis­cov­ered its bio­chem­i­cal role in the lysine degra­da­tion process, and pro­posed it may belong to the B vit­a­min complex.(1)

PQQ and Mito­chon­dr­ial Health

Mito­chon­dria are the energy pro­duc­ers of the cells. They work much like the engine of a car. What is a car with­out its engine? Just a big, inert hunk of metal. Sim­i­larly, with­out mito­chon­dria, the cells in your body would not be able to do any­thing. Your heart would not beat; your lungs would not breathe; your brain would cease to func­tion. Mito­chon­dria are essen­tial to life itself.

As you might expect, since proper mito­chon­dr­ial func­tion is so crit­i­cal for health and life, mito­chon­dr­ial dys­func­tion plays a sig­nif­i­cant part in many types of ill­nesses, includ­ing fibromyal­gia, chronic fatigue syn­drome (ME/CFS), type 2 dia­betes, heart fail­ure, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s dis­ease. And many cell biol­o­gists believe the quan­tity and func­tion of mito­chon­dria are key deter­mi­nants of longevity.(2–4)

Now you’re prob­a­bly won­der­ing what PQQ has to do with our mito­chon­dria. As it turns out, quite a lot.

A series of in-vivo stud­ies found that when mice are deprived of dietary PQQ, they have fewer mito­chon­dria in their tis­sues. They also exhib­ited stunted growth, com­pro­mised immu­nity, and impaired repro­duc­tive capa­bil­ity. In addi­tion, the sur­vival rates of juve­nile mice were sig­nif­i­cantly reduced in the absence of PQQ.(5–7)

Why is PQQ so impor­tant for mito­chon­dr­ial health? Because our mito­chon­dria are extremely vul­ner­a­ble to dam­age and destruc­tion from free rad­i­cals, and PQQ is a super-powerful antiox­i­dant with for­mi­da­ble free-radical scav­eng­ing capa­bil­i­ties. It is also an excep­tion­ally sta­ble mol­e­cule that is able to do its work suc­cess­fully with­out break­ing down.

Accord­ing to a Uni­ver­sity of Cal­i­for­nia at Davis study, PQQ is 30 to 5,000 times more effi­cient in sus­tain­ing mito­chon­dr­ial energy pro­duc­tion than the other com­mon antiox­i­dant com­pounds most peo­ple rely on, like ascor­bic acid.(8)

If you think PQQ’s abil­ity to sup­port and pro­tect exist­ing mito­chon­dria sounds impres­sive, just wait — PQQ is able to per­form an even more impres­sive feat.

In 2010, researchers dis­cov­ered that PQQ actu­ally stim­u­lates mito­chon­dr­ial bio­gen­e­sis — the growth of fresh, new mito­chon­dria! (9)

This was a huge dis­cov­ery. Up until then, the only nat­ural ways known to stim­u­late the growth of new mito­chon­dria were long-term and sus­tained calo­rie restric­tion or stren­u­ous phys­i­cal activ­ity — both of which were far too rig­or­ous and imprac­ti­cal for most aging or ill individuals.

Sup­port­ing Rever­sal of Cog­ni­tive Decline

As we get older, most of us start expe­ri­enc­ing some mem­ory loss and cog­ni­tive func­tion­ing dif­fi­cul­ties — evi­dence of the increased toll free rad­i­cals and oxida­tive stress are tak­ing on our mito­chon­dria. In one study, researchers found evi­dence of 50% more mito­chon­dr­ial dam­age in the brain cells of peo­ple over 70 com­pared to those in middle-aged individuals.(10)

Although that find­ing was not encour­ag­ing, there is good news. Accord­ing to a 2007 sci­en­tific review in Cur­rent Opin­ion in Clin­i­cal Nutri­tion & Meta­bolic Care, age-related mito­chon­dr­ial dys­func­tion can be reversed.(11)

When it comes to improv­ing cog­ni­tive func­tion and revers­ing mito­chon­dr­ial dys­func­tion, PQQ and CoQ10 could aptly be called the dynamic duo.

While CoQ10 works to sup­port opti­mum mito­chon­dr­ial func­tion, PQQ is busy encour­ag­ing the acti­va­tion of genes that trig­ger mito­chon­dr­ial repro­duc­tion, pro­tec­tion and repair.

A 2009 clin­i­cal trial in Japan clearly demon­strated this syn­ergy. Middle-aged and elderly peo­ple who were given 20 mg per day of PQQ showed improve­ment in tests of higher cog­ni­tive func­tion. How­ever, the improve­ments were sig­nif­i­cantly ampli­fied when the sub­jects also took 300 mg of CoQ10 each day. The researchers con­cluded that 20 mg of PQQ plus 300 mg of CoQ10 daily may sup­port rever­sal of age-related cog­ni­tive decline in aging humans.(12)

Neu­ro­pro­tec­tive Effect in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases

Mito­chon­dr­ial dys­func­tion is thought to be linked to age-related dis­eases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. And an increas­ing body of evi­dence indi­cates that PQQ may be an effec­tive inter­ven­tion for Alzheimer’s dis­ease and Parkinson’s disease.

Both dis­eases are trig­gered by an accu­mu­la­tion of abnor­mal pro­teins which ini­ti­ate a cas­cade of oxida­tive dam­age that results in brain cell death. Stud­ies have revealed that PQQ helps the body to:

* Pre­vent devel­op­ment of the pro­tein alpha-synuclein, which is asso­ci­ated with Parkinson’s disease.(13)

* Pre­vent the for­ma­tion of amyloid-beta mol­e­c­u­lar struc­tures asso­ci­ated with Alzheimer’s disease.(14)

* Pro­tect nerve cells from the oxi­diz­ing rav­ages of the amyloid-beta pro­tein linked with Alzheimer’s disease.(15)

PQQ — Look­ing to the Future

It appears that sci­en­tists are just begin­ning to scratch the sur­face of the ben­e­fits PQQ may pro­vide. In sev­eral ani­mal stud­ies, PQQ has shown great promise in sup­port­ing a reduc­tion of the dam­age from heart attack, stroke and spinal cord injury.

For exam­ple, a 2006 study using rats actu­ally found PQQ to be supe­rior to the well known pre­scrip­tion beta-blocker meto­pro­lol in sup­port­ing reduced oxida­tive dam­age after a heart attack. Sup­ple­men­ta­tion with PQQ was asso­ci­ated with a reduced area of car­diac tis­sue death and improved over­all car­diac function.(16)

It’s going to be excit­ing to watch and see what other as-yet-unknown health ben­e­fits PQQ may hold.

ProHealth’s ProMito PQQ

ProMito PQQ is a unique nutri­ent blend which com­bines PQQ with Alpha GPC (alpha glyc­erylphos­pho­ryl­choline) to sup­port enhanced mem­ory reten­tion and pro­mote improved men­tal processing.

Alpha GPC is a pro-phospholipid that deliv­ers the essen­tial nutri­ent choline to the brain. A meta-analysis of 10 clin­i­cal tri­als eval­u­at­ing Alpha GPC and its effec­tive­ness in help­ing dementia-related symp­toms found that patients tak­ing Alpha GPC had con­sis­tently improved scores on a wide vari­ety of mem­ory and atten­tion span tests.(17)

In short, numer­ous stud­ies sug­gest these two novel ingre­di­ents — PQQ and Alpha GPC — pro­mote improved neu­ro­log­i­cal health, improved mem­ory reten­tion and men­tal acu­ity. A ben­e­fit that may be enhanced by a daily reg­i­men that also includes coen­zyme Q10.

Each veg­gie cap­sule of Pro­Health ProMito PQQ con­tains 20 mg PQQ and 50 mg Alpha GPC. One cap­sule per day should be suf­fi­cient for most pur­poses, or as advised by your health­care pro­fes­sional. No adverse side effects are known when it is used appropriately.

Sum­mary

PQQ is an essen­tial nutri­ent that not only pro­tects and defends our exist­ing mito­chon­dria but is also able to stim­u­late the growth of fresh new mito­chon­dria. Numer­ous stud­ies have demon­strated PQQ’s abil­ity to sup­port a rever­sal of cog­ni­tive decline and pro­mote improved mem­ory, con­cen­tra­tion and men­tal alert­ness, espe­cially when taken with coen­zyme Q10.

Posted in Nutrition | Leave a comment

More on genograms

Genograms are maps of the fam­ily, doc­u­ment­ing names, ages, occupations,social contexts,health sta­tus and sig­nif­i­cant fam­ily hap­pen­ings.
We can achieve genetic infor­ma­tion, pro­file of ill­ness and disease,and pos­si­ble vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties as well as resources,strengths and skills.
We can look at,
(1) Fam­ily tra­di­tions and beliefs, divi­sions, alliances, coali­tions and fac­tions.
(2) Edu­ca­tion, and fam­ily val­ues, philoso­phies and reli­gious beliefs.
(3) Rela­tional styles.
(4) Fam­ily myths.
(5) Cir­cu­lar ques­tions to increase under­stand­ing of changes over times as well as fixed beliefs, and strongly held views by par­tic­u­lar per­sons.
(6) Define and describe fam­ily hopes from each per­sons viewpoint.

Posted in psychotherapy/problem solving | Leave a comment

Diagnostic profiling

Psy­choso­cial diag­nos­tic ideas.
(Based on Mil­ton Erick­son, Jeff Zeig and Ken Wilber.
If we are to meet peo­ple at their mod­els of the world, we can try to assess their pat­terns and his­tory.
(1) Name, age, sex, occu­pa­tion, mar­i­tal or part­ner­ship sta­tus.
(2) Place of res­i­dence and past res­i­dences.
(3) Place of birth and grow­ing up.
(4) Lan­guages
(5) Birth order.
(6) Genogram (fam­ily pro­file)
(7) Pre­sent­ing prob­lem, and other prob­lems.
(8) What could be behind the problem(s).
(9) Goals and desired outcomes.(a)As specified(b) implicit.
(10) Behav­iours relat­ing to the prob­lem.
(11) Behav­iours not related to prob­lems.
(12) Atti­tudes.
(13) Moti­va­tion.
(14) Strengths, skills, resources (includ­ing esti­ma­tion by oth­ers).
(15) Val­ues.
(16) Rela­tional style.
One up/one down.
Dominant/submissive
Assertive/compliant
Rebel­lious? Oppo­si­tional? Eccen­tric?
COMPLEMENTARY/SYMMETRICAL
(17) Non ver­bal behav­iours.
(18) Ver­bal style.
(19) Lin­guis­tic expres­sions, edu­ca­tional level and style, cul­tural style.
(20) Rep­re­sen­ta­tional sys­tems .
(21) VISUAL/AUDITORY.KINAESTHETIC/OLFACTORY/GUSTATORY?
(22) Think­ing pat­terns.
Lin­ear, log­i­cal, lat­eral or tan­gen­tial, focussed, dif­fuse, mosaic?
(23) Themes, dia­logues, sto­ry­ing options and ana­logues.
Dom­i­nant and sub­ju­gated sto­ries.
Optional metaphors

(24) Con­spic­u­ous absence.Is some­thing miss­ing?
What could have been over­looked?
(25) Sys­tems think­ing. Iden­tify belief sys­tems in fam­ily and friends.
(26) Vis­it­ing devel­op­men­tal lev­els.
(27) Wilber’s four quad­rants
(28) Explor­ing cre­ativ­ity.
(29) Re-explore resources
(30) Eco­log­i­cal check­ing.
Are solu­tions con­gru­ent with person’s goals and hopes?
(30) Prac­tic­ing new learn­ings and repertoires.Relate them to contexts.

Posted in psychotherapy/problem solving | Leave a comment

inspiring but paradoxical words

You ask me where to begin? Am I so lost in my sin?
You ask me where did I fall? I’ll say I can’t tell you when.
But if my spirit is lost, how will I find what is near?
Don’t ques­tion I’m not alone; some­how I’ll find my way home.

My sun shall rise in the East; so shall my heart be at peace.
And if you’re ask­ing me when, I’ll say it starts at the end.
You know your will to be free is matched with love secretly.
And talk will alter your prayer; some­how you’ll find you are there.

Your friend is close by your side and speaks in far ancient tongue.
A season’s wish will come true: All sea­sons begin with you.
The world we all come from: one world we melt into one.
Just hold my hand and we’re there.
Some­how we’re going somewhere.

You ask me where to begin? Am I so lost in my sin?
You ask me where did I fall? I’ll say I can’t tell you when.
But if my spirit is strong, I’ll know it can’t be long.
No ques­tion, I’m not alone: some­how I’ll find my way home!

Van­ge­lis

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

epistemology/thinking/entelechy

Core human val­ues and the heal­ing and devel­op­ment of selves.
Every human being can grow through stages to bet­ter under­stand­ings of who we are and who we may yet be!
What could we call “core val­ues”?
What has already been ver­i­fied as uni­ver­sally desir­able in our liv­ing?
The begin­nings include being loved and val­ued in a kind of suf­fi­cient nur­tur­ing that gives rise to trust and secu­rity.
We can­not omit nutri­tion, since we are made of what we eat!
Star­va­tion can lead to per­ma­nent brain dam­age.
We can­not omit the impor­tance of being sur­rounded by lan­guage, as this evokes our latent abil­ity to speak, read and write.
We can gain by under­stand­ing what hap­pens as we pro­duce and play with the com­po­nents and pat­terns of lan­guage.
Do edu­ca­tional insti­tu­tions pro­mote exam­i­na­tion of the processes of bring­ing forth lan­guage?
We need to include expo­sure to a more than one way of think­ing, lest we become nar­row and rigid in our reper­toire of life’s pos­si­bil­i­ties.
We can become aware that in a world of infor­ma­tional over­load, we will need to dis­crim­i­nate between pro­pa­ganda and valid and ver­i­fi­able claims.
We can see this as we won­der how much choice we have about our lives at every level.
To turn to the pos­i­tive, we can each come to any moment of any day, and bring to mind three good things that have hap­pened that day.
We can build our lives around this look­ing for the pos­i­tives.
This is likely to lead to valu­ing our­selves.
We can look over our tal­ents and pas­sions and dis­cover that such gifts are to be nur­tured and sup­ported.
We can think of mean­ings and the con­texts in which they exist.
We can glimpse enough of big pic­tures, to see our­selves as par­tic­i­pants in these big pic­tures.
We can call this “per­spec­tive find­ing”.
When we do this we can real­ize that every per­son has a place in her or his own cor­ner of the world.
We are all in this together!
We can respond to dif­fer­ence with curios­ity rather than with hos­til­ity and prej­u­dice.
So you, the reader, are a per­son whose life has mean­ing and impor­tance, and your life from here on is indeed an expres­sion of this real­iza­tion.
We can all be heal­ers!
Let’s do it!

In all of the vast cos­mos, this planet is the only place that we know can sup­port our kind of life.
Since life has devel­oped in pro­found coor­di­na­tion with the domain of its exis­tence, it is appro­pri­ate to have near total con­fi­dence that nature has evolved diverse mech­a­nisms that sup­port com­plex liv­ing sys­tems, with a peak at the human com­plex­ity of an organ­ism with multi-trillions of coor­di­nated cells, and a brain with 100 bil­lion nerve cells and up to 100 tril­lion synap­tic con­nec­tions.
At last we have arrived in lan­guage and can ask ”Who speaks for earth?”
Who are we, that might be on the thresh­old of explain­ing our­selves to our­selves?
A require­ment is a capac­ity to grasp big­ger pic­tures, and this involves ecol­ogy of mind as well as coor­di­na­tion with the health­i­est ecolo­gies in nature.
What a key word is the term “coor­di­na­tion”, when we real­ize that these sys­tems are in fact cyber­netic.
That is, there are” coor­di­na­tions of coor­di­na­tions.”
The feed­back and feed for­ward processes have under­stand­able mech­a­nisms for these reg­u­la­tions.
Epi­ge­net­ics is a splen­did illus­tra­tion of this
There is a very inter­est­ing lec­ture on “New biol­ogy”, by Prof Bruce Lip­ton, and it can be found through Google.
His mod­els make it much clearer about the func­tion of pro­tein fold­ing and the swing­ing ends as elec­tri­cal charges are made.
Thus the cell itself can deter­mine whether genes are acti­vated or silenced, by the sig­nals that oper­ate on the epi­ge­netic marker regions of these his­tones wound around gene structures.(see enclosed dia­grams)
It is fas­ci­nat­ing to see what will emerge in terms of the so called non cod­ing DNAs, which code for RNAs that do not code for pro­tein, but are still like switches in gene coor­di­na­tions.
Human genes occupy about 2% of our DNA, and the” non-coding” region is the remain­ing 98%!
Are his­tones sig­nal receivers here as well?
The close cell to cell talk, the genes that code for cytokine recep­tors will also change accord­ing to what envi­ron­men­tal chem­i­cals (good and bad) do to the his­tone epi­ge­netic recep­tors.
But more remote cyber­netic hap­pen­ings are likely to be result as well (eg in the hyper­in­suli­naemic, insulin resis­tant per­son respond­ing for exam­ple to high fruc­tose intake.

Liv­ing sys­tems are amaz­ingly spe­cific in their within cell, cell to cell, organ to organ, and even brain acti­va­tions and recursions,as elab­o­rate patterns.

Thus mind to mind via lan­guage requires great atten­tion to mean­ings of words and grasp­ing of metaphors.
Never has it been more impor­tant to under­stand how we came to our ideas and expla­na­tions as well as ask­ing each other to elab­o­rate on what­ever is under dis­cus­sion.
So here I am writ­ing about John’s ver­sion of this subject!

Posted in Thinking | Leave a comment

Genetics

Epi­ge­net­ics
There is a very inter­est­ing lec­ture on “New biol­ogy”, by Prof Bruce Lip­ton, and it can be found through Google.
His mod­els make it much clearer about the func­tion of pro­tein fold­ing and the swing­ing ends as elec­tri­cal charges are made.
Thus the cell itself can deter­mine whether genes are acti­vated or silenced, by the sig­nals that oper­ate on the epi­ge­netic marker regions of these his­tones wound around gene structures.(see enclosed dia­grams)
It is fas­ci­nat­ing to see what will emerge in terms of the so called non cod­ing DNAs, which code for RNAs that do not code for pro­tein, but are still like switches in gene coor­di­na­tions.
Human genes occupy about 2% of our DNA, and the” non-coding” region is the remain­ing 98%!
Are his­tones sig­nal receivers here as well?
The close cell to cell talk, the genes that code for cytokine recep­tors will also change accord­ing to what envi­ron­men­tal chem­i­cals (good and bad) do to the his­tone epi­ge­netic recep­tors.
But more remote cyber­netic hap­pen­ings are likely to be result as well(eg in the hyper­in­suli­naemic, insulin resis­tant per­son respond­ing for exam­ple to high fruc­tose intake.(see enclosed meta­bolic dia­gram from Harrison’s Prin­ci­ples of Inter­nal Med­i­cine?)
But what if mind states also result in chem­i­cal changes that are more far reaching?

Posted in Medicine | Leave a comment

Question on Rickettsiae

Hi Brian,
I sus­pect that most of your ques­tions do not have ready answers, so I will com­ment about mate­r­ial where I have evi­dence.
Rick­ettsiae.
Unless we have pos­i­tive PCRs, there is some doubt about valid­ity of sero­log­i­cal test­ing results for rick­ettsial anti­bod­ies.
Only titres over 1/256 may be true pos­i­tives, but even they may also include bio­log­i­cal false pos­i­tives.
It is easy to make errors in testing.Cases with pos­i­tive ANA may be false pos­i­tives
I con­tinue to be inter­ested in Jadin’s work and never use sulphonamides.
I was never con­vinced by Trevor Marshall’s vit­a­min D claims and since 2003 there have been more than 9,000 papers on vit­a­min D.
I can­not find any evi­dence to sup­port Marshal”s com­puter gen­er­ated work on vit­a­min D.
As far as I can tell, he has no cell stud­ies and no liv­ing tis­sue stud­ies.
In gen­eral immune cells work less well with low vit­a­min 25 D3 in blood, and many infec­tions do worse with D defi­cien­cies.
Mus­cle and brain are worse off with low D3.
I try to get all patients 25 D3 up to at least 80 nmol/L.
1,25 D3 lev­els are quite vari­able and no world expert trusts the mean­ing of them.
I would have to look at lit­er­a­ture to see what effect PABA might have.
Do you have any data?
MTHFR gene
There are a num­ber of sep­a­rate methy­la­tion cycles, and the MTHFR poly­mor­phisms shape one of these.
My under­stand­ing is that if you have reduced HC to 8 umol/l or less, you are ade­quately pro­tected.
How do you sup­pose this could affect rick­ettsial activ­ity or path­o­genic­ity?
What would be the logic of using NAC?
Olme­sar­tan.
While there is good evi­dence that olme­sar­tan is anti-inflammatory, the com­puter data on its affin­ity for the 1,25 D recep­tor is uncer­tain and uncon­vinc­ing, in terms of increas­ing 1,25 D3 acti­va­tion.
Olme­sar­tan has about the same affin­ity as irbe­sar­tan for the 1,25 D3 recep­tor (See enclosed table)
It is a very good A2R recep­tor blocker, but it would result in high lev­els of plasma renin.
I would not dare give it in such high doses and in a court of law, could be liable to be con­victed of unsafe prac­tices.
Since Mar­shal does not prac­tice clin­i­cal med­i­cine, he does not face this risk, but some­where down the line he could be pros­e­cuted by the FDA.
The great­est risk is in the phase where he excluded day­light expo­sure and D3 sup­ple­ments.
I have writ­ten to world D experts and they think his advice is wrong and dan­ger­ous.
There is at least some dis­cus­sion about risks of A2R block­ers in increas­ing can­cer risk.
I will be inter­ested in your response,

John G

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Protecting forest

I write because this ruth­less greedy dam­age to for­est will even­tu­ally enact huge tolls on the whole planet.
As many peo­ple as can need to act to stop the dam­age.
Dev­as­ta­tion in Papua
Two mil­lion hectares of for­est are being clear-felled within Special-purpose agri­cul­ture lease areas despite grow­ing evi­dence the leases and the log­ging are totally ille­gal and cause irre­versible envi­ron­men­tal damage.

Please send emails to Prime Min­is­ter, Peter O’Neill, and Deputy Prime Min­is­ter and For­est Min­is­ter, Belden Namah, call­ing on them to sus­pend the log­ging until on-going inves­ti­ga­tions have been completed.

An exist­ing Com­mis­sion of Inquiry into the leases has already uncov­ered sys­temic prob­lems includ­ing fraud, forgery and a fail­ure to secure the informed con­sent of tra­di­tional own­ers. [1]

But the leases have been used to secure For­est Clear­ance Author­i­ties that allow the clear-felling of 2 mil­lion hectares of for­est within the lease areas.

If the leases are unlaw­ful because proper processes have not been fol­lowed and tra­di­tional own­ers have not given their informed con­sent, then the log­ging is also illegal.

Tra­di­tional landown­ers are mount­ing their own protests against the log­ging but they need your help as their protests are being met with vio­lence [2].

The term for the Com­mis­sion of Inquiry has just been extended by 5 months [3] to allow a full inves­ti­ga­tion of all the issues and regional hear­ings — but while the Com­mis­sion process grinds on the log­ging is con­tin­u­ing unabated, caus­ing irre­versable envi­ron­men­tal dam­age, mount­ing com­mu­nity ten­sions [4] and human rights abuses [5].

The gov­ern­ment must imme­di­ately sus­pend all For­est Clear­ance Author­i­ties until the Com­mis­sion of Inquiry has been com­pleted and its rec­om­men­da­tions implemented.

Posted in Belief systems | Leave a comment

World wide tipping point

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment